What altitude is specified for the Alternate Profile I plan?

Study for the VT-10 Primary INAV Ground School Instrument 3 Test. Enhance your skills with multiple choice questions and detailed explanations. Prepare effectively and boost your confidence for the exam!

Multiple Choice

What altitude is specified for the Alternate Profile I plan?

Explanation:
The main idea here is that when you plan an alternate, you choose an altitude for the alternate-leg that ensures you can safely clear terrain and obstacles and still execute the published approach if you need to divert. In this scenario, the Alternate Profile I plan specifies flying the leg to the alternate at 5,000 feet because that height provides a comfortable buffer above the surrounding terrain and obstacles and keeps you in a suitable vertical path to sequence into the instrument approach. Choosing 4,000 or 4,500 feet would tend to give less clearance in areas with rising terrain or obstacles near the alternate airport, making descent and approach timing tighter. Going higher, like 6,000 feet, would be more than what’s required for this plan and would waste fuel and time, and could complicate staying within the published procedure and airspace constraints for the route. So, 5,000 feet is used because it strikes a safe, practical balance for the alternate leg given the scenario’s terrain and approach setup.

The main idea here is that when you plan an alternate, you choose an altitude for the alternate-leg that ensures you can safely clear terrain and obstacles and still execute the published approach if you need to divert. In this scenario, the Alternate Profile I plan specifies flying the leg to the alternate at 5,000 feet because that height provides a comfortable buffer above the surrounding terrain and obstacles and keeps you in a suitable vertical path to sequence into the instrument approach.

Choosing 4,000 or 4,500 feet would tend to give less clearance in areas with rising terrain or obstacles near the alternate airport, making descent and approach timing tighter. Going higher, like 6,000 feet, would be more than what’s required for this plan and would waste fuel and time, and could complicate staying within the published procedure and airspace constraints for the route.

So, 5,000 feet is used because it strikes a safe, practical balance for the alternate leg given the scenario’s terrain and approach setup.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy